Journal of Memory

Submit Manuscript
  • For authors
  • Open access ยท CC BY

Instructions for Authors

How to prepare and submit a manuscript to the Journal of Memory: submission routes, article types, manuscript structure, reporting standards, ethics statements and fees.

Submission

Submission routes

  1. Primary route

    ManuscriptZone

    The publisher's online submission and review system. Register or sign in, choose the Journal of Memory and upload the manuscript files.

  2. Alternative route

    Simple manuscript submission form

    A single-page form that opens with the Journal of Memory selected.

  3. Assisted route: editorial email

    info@openaccesspub.org

    For authors who are unable to use either online route. Send the manuscript files with a cover letter to the editorial office.

Authors must use only one submission route for the same manuscript.

Formats

Article types

JM publishes the article types below. Requirements depend on the format: hypotheses, outcomes, power calculations and a Methods and Results structure apply where the design calls for them. The scope of each type is set out in the Aims and Scope.

Original Research

Empirical studies of memory using quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods, including behavioral, neuroimaging, clinical and longitudinal designs.

Abstract
Structured: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions.
Main text
Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions. State the research question and, where applicable, the hypotheses, primary and secondary outcomes and the sample-size or power calculation. Report participants, materials, procedure and exclusions in enough detail for replication.
Reporting
The guideline for the design, for example JARS, STROBE, CONSORT, COBIDAS or COREQ.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Systematic syntheses of evidence on a defined question in memory research, with or without meta-analysis. Scoping and rapid reviews that use systematic methods are included.

Abstract
Structured.
Main text
Introduction; Methods (eligibility criteria, information sources and the full search strategy, study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment and synthesis); Results with a flow diagram; Discussion. Give the protocol registration, for example in PROSPERO, where applicable.
Reporting
PRISMA 2020; PRISMA-ScR for scoping reviews.

Methods

New, adapted or validated tasks, measures, analysis methods or study designs for memory research, and protocols for planned studies.

Abstract
Structured, with headings adapted to the method.
Main text
Rationale; a description of the method with the detail, code or materials others need to apply it; validation or a worked application, compared with existing approaches where available; limitations. A protocol sets out the design, outcomes, analysis plan, ethics approval and registration, and has no Results section.
Reporting
SPIRIT for trial protocols, PRISMA-P for review protocols and COSMIN for measurement properties, where applicable.

Registered Report

A study whose question, methods and analysis plan are peer reviewed before data collection (Stage 1) and whose completed report is assessed against that plan (Stage 2).

Abstract
Structured; Stage 1 submissions give the planned study.
Main text
Stage 1: Introduction, hypotheses, Methods with the full analysis plan, power analysis and pilot data where available. Stage 2: the approved Stage 1 text, Results and Discussion, with any deviations from the plan stated and justified.
Reporting
As for Original Research, where applicable.

Replication Study

A direct or conceptual replication of a published finding on memory, whatever the outcome.

Abstract
Structured.
Main text
Introduction identifying the original study and what is being replicated; Methods stating where the procedure follows or departs from the original; Results, with a comparison to the original findings; Discussion.
Reporting
As for Original Research, where applicable.

Short Communication

A concise report of a focused or preliminary finding of importance to memory research.

Abstract
Brief, structured.
Main text
A condensed Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion centered on the main finding.
Reporting
As for Original Research, where applicable.

Data Note

A description of a dataset of value to memory research, such as behavioral, imaging or normative data, to support its reuse.

Abstract
Brief, unstructured.
Main text
Background and rationale; data collection methods; description of the dataset (variables, format, coverage); quality control; data access, with the repository, persistent identifier and license; limitations for reuse. Analyses are limited to those that describe the data.
Reporting
Deposit the dataset in a recognized repository before submission, and follow the guideline for the original study design where applicable.

Theoretical Perspective

An evidence-grounded theoretical analysis or synthesis that advances thinking about memory, including formal and computational accounts.

Abstract
Brief, unstructured.
Main text
Free structure with descriptive headings: the problem, the existing accounts, the proposed account, the evidence for and against it, and testable predictions.
Reporting
Reference the evidence for each claim; for computational models, state the assumptions and provide code or equations.

Commentary

An evidence-based argument on a current question in memory research or on published work. Perspectives and viewpoints are submitted as Commentaries or Theoretical Perspectives.

Abstract
Brief, unstructured.
Main text
Free structure with descriptive headings; claims supported by cited evidence and conclusions proportionate to it. Methods and Results sections are not required.
Reporting
Reference the evidence for each claim.

Letter to the Editor

A brief response to an article published in JM, or a short observation relevant to memory research.

Abstract
None.
Main text
Short text without section headings and with a small number of references. A letter about a published article cites it in full, and its authors may be invited to reply.
Reporting
Reference the article or evidence discussed.

Length. There are no fixed length limits for any article type; manuscripts should be concise and proportionate to their content.

Choosing a type. Where a manuscript sits between types, choose the closest type and explain the choice in the cover letter; the editors confirm the classification. A study protocol is classified as Methods, and a scoping review as a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Manuscript

Preparing the manuscript

These requirements apply to every article type. The structure of the main text follows the guidance for the type above.

Files
The main text as an editable word-processing file (for example, Microsoft Word), with figures, tables that cannot be edited in the text, and supplementary material supplied as separate files.
Title page
A concise, informative title; full names, affiliations and ORCID iDs (recommended) of all authors; and the corresponding author's contact details.
Double-blind review
For double-blind review, remove author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding details, institution names, and other identifying information from the reviewer manuscript. Provide identifying information separately in the title-page file or submission form.
Abstract
As set for the article type. Structured abstracts use the headings Background, Methods, Results and Conclusions.
Keywords
A short list of specific, searchable terms; Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) are recommended.
Statistics
Describe statistical methods in enough detail for replication; report effect estimates with confidence intervals, give exact p-values where statistical tests are used, and name the software and version.
Declarations
Author contributions (CRediT), funding, conflicts of interest, ethics approval and consent where applicable, data availability and any use of AI tools.
Cover letter
States the article type and the relevance of the work to memory research, confirms that the manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere, and notes any preprint and any request for double-blind review.
Language
Clear English, with abbreviations defined at first use.
Reporting standards

Reporting guidelines

Report the study following the guideline that matches its design and upload the completed checklist as a supplementary file. The guidelines are available from the EQUATOR Network.

Reporting guidelines by study design
Study designGuideline
Randomized trialsCONSORT
Non-randomized evaluations of interventionsTREND
Observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional)STROBE
Psychology and behavioral researchJARS (APA Journal Article Reporting Standards)
Neuroimaging studiesCOBIDAS
Systematic reviews and meta-analysesPRISMA 2020
Scoping reviewsPRISMA-ScR
Trial and review protocolsSPIRIT; PRISMA-P
Diagnostic accuracy studiesSTARD
Measurement properties of tests and scalesCOSMIN
Qualitative researchSRQR or COREQ
Economic evaluationsCHEERS 2022
Quality improvement studiesSQUIRE 2.0
Case reports and short case series (submitted as a Short Communication, or as Original Research if longer)CARE
Animal researchARRIVE 2.0
Presentation

References, tables and figures

Reference style
Numbered in order of first citation. List the first five authors, then et al., and give a DOI or stable URL where one exists. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of references.
Tables
Numbered consecutively, each with a descriptive title; abbreviations and symbols explained in a footnote.
Figures
High resolution (at least 300 dpi) in TIFF, EPS, PNG or high-quality JPEG, with a caption for each figure and text that remains legible after reduction. Maps state their data sources.
Supplementary files
Numbered (for example, Supplementary Table S1), cited in the text and listed with short titles at the end of the manuscript. They are published as supplied, so they must be final and free of participant identifiers.
Reused material
Written permission from the copyright holder to reproduce or adapt published figures, tables or text, unless the material is already available under a license that permits reuse; the source is cited in the legend.

Reference examples

Journal article
Author AA, Author BB, Author CC, Author DD, Author EE, et al. (Year) Title of the article. Journal Name. Volume(Issue):pages. DOI: 10.xxxx/xxxxx
Book
Author AA, Author BB (Year) Title of the Book. Edition. Place of publication: Publisher.
Report or webpage
Organization Name (Year) Title of the report or page. URL (accessed Month Day, Year)
Dataset
Author AA, Author BB (Year) Title of the dataset. Version. Repository Name. DOI or accession number
Preprint
Author AA, Author BB (Year) Title of the preprint. Preprint Server Name [Preprint]. DOI: 10.xxxx/xxxxx
Trial registration
Sponsor or Principal Investigator (Year) Title of the trial. Registry Name. Registration number. Registered Month Day, Year. URL
Research ethics

Ethics and declarations

Each manuscript includes the statements below that apply to it. The full policies are set out in the Editorial Policies.

  • Human participants

    The name of the approving ethics committee or institutional review board and the approval reference number, and confirmation of informed consent, or a waiver documented by the ethics committee, where applicable. Studies of anonymized or routinely collected data state whether ethics review was required.

  • Clinical trials

    Interventional clinical trials must be registered in an accepted public trial registry at or before the first participant provides consent for enrollment. The registry name, registration number, and registration date must be reported in the manuscript.

  • Animal research

    Approval from the institutional animal care and use committee or animal ethics committee with its reference number, compliance with animal-welfare regulations and the 3Rs, and reporting in line with the ARRIVE guidelines.

  • Participants and patients

    Informed consent for publication from any person who could be identified, or a waiver documented by the ethics committee, where applicable, with identifying details removed.

  • Conflicts of interest and funding

    All financial and non-financial interests of every author, each source of funding and the role of the funder.

  • Data availability

    Every empirical research manuscript must include a data-availability statement. It explains where the data can be found or the conditions for access.

  • Use of AI tools

    Any use of AI tools in writing, analysis or figure preparation, with the tool named and its use described. AI tools are not listed as authors.

After submission

Peer review and decisions

All submissions undergo initial editorial screening, including a similarity check with Crossref Similarity Check. Manuscripts that meet the journal's scope and minimum requirements proceed to independent peer review.

Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request.

Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts. Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal.

Revised manuscripts are accompanied by a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments. After acceptance, authors check the proofs, and the article is published open access under CC BY.

Charges

Fees

USD 1,500 article processing charge for every article type.

The article processing charge is payable only after acceptance; withdrawal after submission is subject to the journal's withdrawal policy.

No charge is made at submission. Fee-relief inquiries are considered case by case; contact the editorial office before or at submission. Full details are on the Article Processing Charges page.

Before you submit

Final checklist

A fuller checklist and the submission routes are on the Submit Manuscript page.

  1. The manuscript addresses a question about memory and uses one of the article types above.
  2. The title page, abstract, keywords and main text follow the guidance for the article type.
  3. For double-blind review, the reviewer manuscript is anonymized and identifying information is in the title-page file.
  4. Ethics approval, consent or waiver, and trial registration are reported where applicable.
  5. The completed reporting checklist is attached where applicable.
  6. Declarations cover contributions, funding, conflicts of interest, data availability and AI use.
  7. Figures, tables and supplementary files are cited in the text, and permissions are in place for reused material.
  8. A cover letter accompanies the submission, which is made through one route only.
Questions

Author inquiries

Questions about preparing or submitting a manuscript can be sent to the editorial office at info@openaccesspub.org.

Menu